Exam Updates. Home Books B. Books Reference Books. By Daily Exams Last updated Oct 22, Content in this Article. Related Posts. Sc Course Books B. Sc Course Specializations B. Sc Reference Books B. Next Post B. You might also like.
Reference Books. Sani kumar says 3 months ago. Khushboo kumari says 3 months ago. Notes chemistry honers paper ka hindi and english dono me. Ramswaroop meena says 4 months ago. Sandeep kumar says 4 months ago. Sir physical education bsc 2nd year notes english me chahiye. Shreya says 4 months ago. Sir plz I want all b.
Rohan GOTA says 4 months ago. Sir I need b. Narmada says 5 months ago. Priyal says 5 months ago. Harsha says 5 months ago. Sir I want SI books fr sub inspector …. Keshab says 5 months ago. Sir bsc 5th semester ka nots sahia….. Bsc-lll year maths -ll Mechanics ka solution plz sir. Pratiksha bhosale says 5 months ago. Vaishnavi says 5 months ago. Mahi Dhawale says 5 months ago.
Nainsi Modanwal says 6 months ago. Ivan Bolivar. A short summary of this paper. The Task Force charter is to standardize the reference manuals, reporting formats and technical nomenclature used by DaimlerChrysler, Ford and General Motors in their respective supplier assessment systems.
Accordingly, this Reference Manual can be used by any supplier to develop information responding to the requirements of either Daimlerchrysler's, Ford's or General Motors' supplier assessment systems. This second edition was prepared to recognize the needs and changes within the automotive industry in SPC techniques that have evolved since the original manual was published in The manual is an introduction to statistical process control. It is not intended to limit evolution of SPC methods suited to particular processes or commodities.
While these guidelines are intended to cover normally occurring SPC system situations, there will be questions that arise. If you are uncertain as to how to contact the appropriate SQA activity, the buyer in your customer's purchasing office can help.
Therefore this manual was developed to meet the specific needs of the automotive industry. Hiner of Delphi Corporation, and David W. Stamps of The Robert Bosch Corp.
The latest improvements were updating the format to confonn to the current AIAGI IS01 TS documentation, more clarification and examples to make the manual more user friendly and additional areas which where not included or did not exist when the ori-ginalmanual was written.
Michael H. Accordingly, this Reference Manual can be used by any supplier to develop information responding to the requirements of either Chrysler's, Ford's or General Motors' supplier assessment systems. Until now, there has been no unified formal approach in the automotive industry on statistical process control. Certain manufacturers provided methods for their suppliers, while others had no specific requirements. In an effort to simplify and minimize variation in supplier quality requirements, Chrysler, Ford, and General Motors agreed to develop and, through AIAG, distribute this manual.
The work team responsible for the Manual's content was led by Leonard A. Brown of General Motors. The manual should be considered an introduction to statistical process control.
It is not intended to limit evolution of statistical methods suited to particular processes or commodities nor is it intended to be comprehensive of all SPC techniques.
Questions on the use of alternate methods should be referred to your customer's quality activity. Stallkamp at Chrysler, Clinton D. Lauer at Ford, and Donald A. Phelan in the development, production and distribution of this Reference manual. We also wish to thank the ASQC reading team led by Tripp Martin of Peterson Spring, who reviewed the Manual and in the process made valuable contributions to intent and content.
Bruce W. Additional copies can be ordered from A. Harvey Goltzer of the Chrysler Corporation contributed concepts relative to process capability and capability studies, found in the introduction section of Chapter I.
Jack Herman of Du Pont contributed some of the concepts relative to capability and performance indices and the importance of measurement variability, found in portions of Chapters I1 and IV, respectively. The General Motors Powertrain Division contributed the discussion and examples relative to subgrouping and process over-adjustment. The section in Chapter I1 which provides understanding of process capability and related issues was developed by the General Motors Corporate Statistical Review Committee.
Leonard A. Brown, Victor W. Lowe, Jr David R. Benham, G. Ford Chrysler I vii Continual Improvement and Statistical Process Control A Process Control System I 3 Variation: Common Control Charts Section A Section C Manual User Feedback Process Variation: Common Cause and Special Cause The Process Improvement Cycle Attributes Data Elements of Control Charts Sample Control Chart Front side Sample Control Chart back side - Event Log Extending Control Limits Control Limits Recalculation Extend Control Limits for Ongoing Control Process Variation Relative to Specification Limits Points Beyond Control Limits Runs in an Average Control Chart Nonrandom Patterns in a Control Chart Average and Standard Deviation Charts Median and Range Charts Individual and Moving Range Charts Proportion Nonconforming Chart Number of Nonconforming Chart Number of Nonconforming per Unit Chart Number of Nonconformities Chart Stoplight Control X, MR Chart X, MR Chart of Viscosity Cpkand PpkComparison Comparison between a Predictable and Immature Process Loss Function Comparison of Loss Function and Specifications Comparison of Loss Functions Process Alignment to Requirements We must constantly seek more efficient ways to produce products and services.
These products and services must continue to improve in value. We must focus upon our customers, both internal and external, and make customer satisfaction a primary business goal. To accomplish this, eveiyone in our organizations must be committed to improvement and to the use of effective methods.
This manual describes several basic statistical methods that can be used to make our efforts at improvement more effective. Different levels of understanding are needed to perfom different tasks.
This manual is aimed at practitioners and managers beginning the application of statistical methods. It will also serve as a refresher on these basic methods for those who are now using more advanced techniques. Not all basic methods are included here.
Coverage of other basic methods such as check sheets, flowcharts, Pareto charts, cause and effect diagrams and some advanced methods such as other control charts, designed experiments, quality fiinction deployment, etc.
The basic statistical methods addressed in this manual include those associated with statistical process control and process capability analysis. Chapter I provides background for process control, explains several important concepts such as special and common causes of variation.
It also introduces the control chart, which can be a very effective tool for analyzing and monitoring processes. Chapter I1 describes the construction and use of control charts for both variables1 data and attributes data.
Chapter I11 describes other types of control charts that can be used for specialized situations - probability based charts, short-sun charts, chasts for detecting small changes, non-normal, multivariate and other charts. Chapter IV addresses process capability analysis. The Appendices address sampling, over-adjustment, a process for selecting control charts, table of constants and formulae, the normal table, a glossary of terms and symbols, and references.
The overall aim should be increased understanding of the reader's processes. It is very easy to become technique experts without realizing any improvements.
Increased knowledge should become a basis for action. Measurement systems are critical to proper data analysis and they should be well understood before process data are collected. When such systems lack statistical control or their variation accounts for a substantial portion of the total variation in process data, inappropriate decisions may be made. For the purposes of this manual, it will be assumed that this system is under control and is not a significant contributor to total variation in the data.
The basic concept of studying variation and using statistical signals to improve performance can be applied to any area. Such areas can be on the shop floor or in the office.
Some examples are machines performance characteristics , bookkeeping error rates , gross sales, waste analysis scrap rates , computer systems performance characteristics and materials management transit times. This manual focuses upon shop floor applications. The reader is encouraged to consult the references in Appendix H for administrative and service applications. Historically, statistical methods have been routinely applied to parts, rather than processes.
Application of statistical techniques to control output such as parts should be only the first step. Until the processes that generate the output become the focus of our efforts, the fhll power of these methods to improve quality, increase productivity and reduce cost may not be fully realized. Although each point in the text is illustrated with a worked-out example, real understanding of the subject involves deeper contact with process control situations.
The study of actual cases from the reader's own job location or from similar activities would be an important supplement to the text. There is no substitute for hands-on experience. This manual should be considered a first step toward the use of statistical methods. It provides generally accepted approaches, which work in many instances.
However, there exist exceptions where it is improper to blindly use these approaches. This manual does not replace the need for practitioners to increase their knowledge of statistical methods and theory. Readers are encouraged to pursue formal statistical education. In any event, the procedures used must satisfy the customer's requirements. In administrative situations, work is often checked and rechecked in efforts to catch errors. Both cases involve a strategy of detection, which is wasteful, because it allows time and materials to be invested in products or services that are not always usable.
It is much more effective to avoid waste by not producing unusable output in the first place - a strategy of prevention. A prevention strategy sounds sensible - even obvious - to most people. It is easily captured in such slogans as, "Do it right the first time". However, slogans are not enough. What is required is an understanding of the elements of a statistical process control system. The remaining seven subsections of this introduction cover these elements and can be viewed as answers to the following questions: What is meant by a process control system?
How does variation affect process output? How can statistical techniques tell whether a problem is local in nature or involves broader systems? What is meant by a process being in statistical control? What is meant by a process being capable? What is a continual improvement cycle, and what part can process control play in it? What are control charts, and how are they used? What benefits can be expected from using control charts?
As this material is being studied, the reader may wish to refer to the Glossary in Appendix G for brief definitions of key terms and symbols. SPC is one type of feedbaclc system. Other such systems, which are not statistical, also exist. The total perfomance of tlie process depends upon communication between supplier and customer, tlie way the process is designed and implemented, and on the way it is operated and managed.
The rest of the process control system is useful only if it contributes either to maintaining a level of excellence or to improving the total performance of the process. Information About Perfor ance - Much information about the actual performance of the process can be learned by studying the process output. The most helpful infomation about the perfomance of a process comes, however, from understanding the process itself and its internal variability.
Process characteristics such as temperatures, cycle times, feed rates, absenteeisill, turnover, tardiness, or number of intemlptions should be the ultimate focus of our efforts. We need to deteimine the target values for those characteristics that result in the most productive operation of the process, and then monitor how near to or far from those target values we are. If this information is gathered and interpreted correctly, it can show whether the process is acting in a usual or unusual manner.
Proper actions can then be taken, if needed, to correct the process or the just-produced otltput. When action is needed it must be timely and appropriate, or the information-gathering effort is wasted. Action on the Process - Action on the process is frequently most economical when taken to prevent the important characteristics process or output from varying too far from their target values. This ensures the stability and the variation of the process output is maintained within acceptable limits.
Such action might consist of: a, Changes in the operations J operator training J changes to the incoming materials Changes in the more basic elements of the process itself J the equipment J how people communicate and relate J the design of the process as a whole - which may be vulnerable to changes in shop temperature or humidity The effect of actions should be monitored, with further analysis and action taken if necessary.
Unfortunately, if current output does not consistently meet customer requirements, it may be necessary to sort all products and to scrap or rework any nonconforming items. This must continue until the necessary corrective action on the process has been taken and verified. It is obvious that inspection followed by action on only the output is a poor substitute for effective process management. Action on only the output should be used strictly as an interim measure for unstable or incapable processes see Chapter I, Section E.
Therefore, the discussions that follow focus on gathering process information and analyzing it so that action can be taken to correct the process itself. Remember, the focus should be on prevention not detection. If only common causes of variation are present and do not change, the output of a process is predictable. Special causes often called assignable causes refer to any factors causing variation that affect only some of the process output.
They are often intermittent and unpredictable. Special causes are signaled by one or more points beyond the control limits or non-random patterns of points within the control limits. Unless all the special causes of variation are identified and acted upon, they may continue to affect the process output in unpredictable ways. If special causes of variation are present, the process output will not be stable over time.
When detrimental, they need to be understood and removed. When beneficial, they should be understood and made a perrnanent part of the process. With some mature processes2, the customer may give special allowance to run a process with a consistently occurring special cause. Such allowances will usually require that the process control plans can assure conformance to customer requirements and protect the process from other special causes see Chapter I, Section E. Discovering a special cause of variation and taking the proper action is usually the responsibility of someone who is directly connected with the operation.
Although management can sometimes be involved to correct the condition, the resolution of a special cause of variation usually requires local action, i. This is especially true during the early process improvement efforts. As one succeeds in taking the proper action on special causes, those that remain will often require management action, rather than local action. These same simple statistical techniques can also indicate the extent of common causes of variation, but the causes themselves need more detailed analysis to isolate.
The correction of these common causes of variation is usually the responsibility of management. Sometimes people directly connected with the operation will be in a better position to identi them and pass them on to management for action. Overall, the resolution of common causes of variation usually requires action on the system. Confusion about the type of action to take is very costly to the organization, in terms of wasted effort, delayed resolution of trouble, and aggravating problems.
It may be wrong, for example, to take local action e. Deming has treated this issue in many articles; e. Juran, and have been borne out in Dr. Deming's experience. As such, the goal of the process control system is to make predictions about the current and future state of the process. This leads to economically sound decisions about actions affecting the process. These decisions require balancing the risk of taking action when action is not necessary over-control or "tampering" versus failing to take action when action is necessary under-control!
These risks should be handled, however, in the context of the two sources of variation - special causes and common causes see Figure 1. A process is said to be operating in statistical control when the only sources of variation are common causes. One function of a process control system, then, is to provide a statistical signal when special causes of variation are present, and to avoid giving false signals when they are not present.
This allows appropriate action s to be taken upon those special causes either removing them or, if they are beneficial, making them permanent.
It generally represents the best performance of the process itself. This is demonstrated when the process is being operated in a state of statistical control regardless of the specifications. Customers, internal or external, are however more typically concerned with the process performance; that is, the overall output of the process and how it relates to their requirements defined by specifications , irrespective of the process variation.
I See TS See W. Deming, , and W. Shewhart, 1. As long as the process remains in statistical control and does not undergo a change in location, spread or shape, it will continue to produce the same distribution of in- specification parts. Once the process is in statistical control the first action on the process should be to locate the process on the target.
If the process spread is unacceptable, this strategy allows the minimum number of out-of- specification parts to be produced. Actions on the system to reduce the variation from common causes are usually required to improve the ability of the process and its output to meet specifications consistently.
For a more detailed discussion of process capability, process performance and the associated assumptions, refer to Chapter IV. The process must first be brought into statistical control by detecting and acting upon special causes of variation. Then its performance is predictable, and its capability to meet customer expectations can be assessed. This is a basis for continual improvement. Every process is subject to classification based on capability and control.
A process can be classified into 1 of 4 cases, as illustrated by the following chart: To be acceptable, the process must be in a state of statistical control and the capability common cause variation must be less than the tolerance. The ideal situation is to have a Case 1 process where the process is in statistical control and the ability to meet tolerance requirements is acceptable. A Case 2 process is in control but has excessive common cause variation, which must be reduced.
A Case 3 process meets tolerance requirements but is not in statistical control; special causes of variation should be identified and acted upon. In Case 4, the process is not in control nor is it acceptable. Both common and special cause variation must be reduced. Under certain circumstances, the customer may allow a producer to run a process even though it is a Case 3 process.
These circumstances may include: The customer is insensitive to variation within specifications see discussion on the loss function in Chapter IV. Economically allowable special causes may include tool wear, tool regrind, cyclical seasonal variation, etc. In these situations, the customer may require the following: 0 The process is mature.
See also Appendix A for a discussion on time dependent processes. These results are used as a basis for prediction of how the process will perform. There is little value in making predictions based on data collected from a process that is not stable and not repeatable over time.
Special causes are responsible for changes in the shape, spread, or location of a process distribution, and thus can rapidly invalidate prediction about the process.
That is, in order for the various process indices and ratios to be used as predictive tools, the requirement is that the data used to calculate them are gathered from processes that are in a state of statistical control. Process indices can be divided into two categories: those that are calculated using within-subgroup estimates of variation and those using total variation when estimating a given index see also chapter IV.
Several different indices have been developed because: 1 No single index can be universally applied to all processes, and 2 No given process can be completely described by a single index. For example, it is recommended that C, and CpX both be used see Chapter IV , and fkther that they be combined with graphical techniques to better understand the relationship between the estimated distribution and the specification limits.
In one sense, this amounts to comparing and trying to align the "voice of the process" with the "voice of the customer" see also Sherkenbach 1. All indices have weaknesses and can be misleading. Any inferences drawn from computed indices should be driven by appropriate interpretation of the data from which the indices were computed.
It is the reader's responsibility to communicate with their customer and i determine which indices to use. In some cases, it might be best to use no index at all. It is important to remember that most capability indices include the product specification in the formula. If the specification is inappropriate, or not based upon customer requirements, much time and effort may be wasted in trying to force the process to conform.
Chapter IV deals with selected capability and performance indices and contains advice on the application of those indices. Every process is in one of the three stages of the Improvement Cycle.
Among the questions to be answered in order to achieve a better understanding of the process are: What should the process be doing? J What is expected at each step of the process?
J What are the operational definitions of the deliverables? J What can vary in this process? J What do we already know about this process' variability? J What parameters are most sensitive to variation? What is the process doing? J Is this process producing scrap or output that requires rework? J Does this process produce output that is in a state of statistical control?
J Is the process capable? J Is the process reliable? Many techniques discussed in the APQP iManua17may be applied to gain a better understanding of the process. These simple statistical methods help differentiate between common and special causes of variation. The special causes of variation must be addressed. When a state of statistical control has been reached, the process7 current level of long-term capability can be assessed see Chapter IV.
Processes are dynamic and will change. The performance of the process should be monitored so effective measures to prevent undesirable change can be taken. Again, the simple statistical methods explained in this manual can assist. Construction and use of control charts and other tools will allow for efficient monitoring of the process.
When the tool signals that the process has changed, quick and efficient measures can be taken to isolate the cause s and act upon them. It is too easy to stop at this stage of the Process Improvement Cycle. It is important to realize that there is a limit to any company's resources. Some, perhaps many, processes should be at this stage. However, failure to proceed to the next stage in this cycle can result in a significant competitive disadvantage. The attainment of "world class" requires a steady and planned effort to move into the next stage of the Cycle.
Up to this point, the effort has been to stabilize the processes and maintain them. However, for some processes, the customer will be sensitive even to variation within engineering specifications see Chapter IV.
In these instances, the value of continual improvement will not be realized until variation is reduced. At this point, additional process analysis tools, including more advanced statistical methods such as designed experiments and advanced control charts may be usefid. Process improvement through variation reduction typically involves purposefully introducing changes into the process and measuring the effects.
The goal is a better understanding of the process, so that the common cause variation can be further reduced. The intent of this reduction is improved quality at lower cost. When new process parameters have been determined, the Cycle shifts back to Analyze the Process. Since changes have been made, process stability will need to be reconfirmed. The process then continues to move around the Process Improvement Cycle. Calculate trial control limits from process data. Identify special causes of variation and act upon them.
Deming identifies two mistakes frequently made in process control: "Mistake 1. Ascribe a variation or a mistake to a special cause, when in fact the cause belongs to the system common causes. Mistake 2. Ascribe a variation or a mistake to a system common causes , when in fact the cause was special.
Over adjustment [tampering] is a common example of mistake No. Never doing anything to try to find a special cause is a common example of mistake No. There is a common misconception that histograms can be used for this purpose. Histograms are the graphical representation of the distributional form of the process variation. The distributional form is studied to verify that the process variation is symmetric and unimodal and that it follows a normal distribution.
Unfortunately normality does not guarantee that there are no special causes acting on the process. That is, some special causes may change the process without destroying its symmetry or unimodality. Also a non- normal distribution may have no special causes acting upon it but its distributional form is non-symmetric. Time-based statistical and probabilistic methods do provide necessary and sufficient methods of determining if special causes exist.
Although several classes of methods are useful in this task, the most versatile and robust is the genre of control charts which were first developed and implemented by Dr. He first made the distinction between controlled and uncontrolled variation due to what is called common and special causes. He developed a simple but powerful tool to separate the two - the control chart.
Since that time, control charts have been used successfully in a wide variety of process control and improvement situations. Experience has shown that control charts effectively direct attention toward special causes of variation when they occur and reflect the extent of common cause variation that must be reduced by system or process improvement.
It is impossible to reduce the above mistakes to zero. Shewhart realized this and developed a graphical approach to minimize, over the long run, the economic loss from both mistakes. Shewhart 1. The active existence of any special cause will render the process out of statistical control or "out of control. When Shewhart developed control charts lie was concerned with the economic control of processes; i.
To do this, sample statistics are compared to control limits. But how are these limits determined? Consider a process distribution that can be described by the normal form. The goal is to determine when special causes are affecting it.
Another way of saying this is, "Has the process changed since it was last looked at it or during the period sampled? Whenever an average, range, or histogram is used to summarize data, the summary should not mislead the user into taking any action that the user would not take if the data were presented in a time series.
Since the normal distribution is described by its process location mean and process width range or standard deviation this question becomes: Has the process location or process width changed? Consider only the location. What approach can be used to determine if the process location has changed?
One possibility would be to look at 10 This is done by using the process infomation to identify and eliminate the existence of special causes or detecting them and removing their effect when they do occur. The exact level of belief in prediction of future actions cannot be determined by statistical measures alone. Subject-matter expertise is required. The alternative is to use a sample of the process, and calculate the mean of the sample. Has the process changed n.
The answer is that this very rarely happens. But how is this possible? After all, the process has not changed. Doesn't that imply that the process mean remains the same? The reason for this is that the sample mean is only an estimation of the process mean. To make this a little clearer, consider taking a sample of size one. The mean of the sample is the individual sample itself.
With such random samples from the distribution, the readings will eventually cover the entire process range. Then, compare the Sam le to the sampling distribution using the 1 3 standard deviation limits! These are called control limits. If the sample falls outside these limits then there is reason to believe that a special cause is present. Further, it is expected that all the random samples will exhibit a random ordering within these limits.
If a group of samples shows a pattern there is reason to believe that a special cause is present. I l3 Shewhart selected the k3 standard deviation limits as useful limits in achieving the economic control of processes. J Are the data consistent; i. Steiner 13 Test Bank. Beatty 5 Instructor's Manual. Beatty 5 Test Bank. Mann, Barry S. Roberts 10 Instructor's Manual. Roberts 10 Test Bank.
Revelle 2 Solution Manual. Blitzer 3 Instructor's Solution Manual. Seiler,Lincoln Melissa L. Beall 8 Test Bank. Sebesta 9 Instructor's Solutions Manaul. Babin, Eric Harris Instructor's Manual. Babin, Eric Harris Test Bank. Cheeseman 7 Instructor's Manual.
Cheeseman 7 Test Bank. Boone Instructor's Manual. Mowen Solution Manual. Mowen Test Bank. Ehrhardt, Eugene F. Brigham 2 Solution Manual. Brigham 2 Test Bank. Pratt Solution Manual. Pratt Test Bank. Horngren 14 Solution Manual. Horngren 14 Instructor's Manual. Boardman 3 Solution Manual. Gilbert 8 Instructor's Manual with Tests.
Robbins 6 Instructor's Manual with Test Bank. Christian Albright 4 Solution Manual. Christian Albright 4 Cases Solutions. Mannino 3 Solution Manual. Breyer, Kenneth J. Fridley 6 Solution Manual. Couch, Leon W. Roth 2 Instructor's Solution Manual. Coulouris, J. Dollimore Solution Manual. Dollimore and T. Kindberg 5 Solution Manual. Mishkin 9 Solution Manual.
Mishkin 9 Test Bank. May, Gordon S. Norbury Solution Manual. Felder Solution Manual. Barringer, Duane Ireland 4 Test Bank. Kuratko 8 Instructor's Manual. Kuratko 8 Test Bank.
Copley 9 Solution Manual. Copley 9 Test Bank. Copley 10 Solution Manual. Copley 10 Test Bank. Reimers 2 Solution Manual. Text and Cases by Schroeder 10 Solution Manual. Text and Cases by Schroeder 10 Test Bank. Warren, James M. Reeve 9 Instructor's Manual. Reeve 9 Solution Manual. Reeve 9 Test Bank.
Brigham, Michael C. Ehrhardt 13 Solution. Ehrhardt 13 Test Bank. F Ross Solution Manual. Coduto 2 Solution Manual. Curtis Solution Manual. Brealey 7 Instructor's Manual. Van Horne and and John M. Hull 7 Solution Manual.
Groover 3 Solution Manual. Moffett 4 Instructor's Manual. Jayant Baliga Solution Manual. Futrell 12 Test Bank. Ebbing and Steven D. Gammon 9 Solution Manual. Freeman 9. Freeman 9 Test Bank. Schultz Instructor Resource Manual. Marieb 10 Solution Manual.
Marieb 10 Test Bank. DuBrin 9 Instructor's Manual. DuBrin 9 Test Bank. Mathis 6 Instrcutor's Manual. Mathis 6 Test Bank. John Bernardin 5 Solution Manual. John Bernardin 5 Test Bank. Choi ,Gary K. Meek 6 Solution Manual. Hill 6. Hill 8 Instructor's Manual. Hill 8 Test Bank. Resnick 5 Solution Manual. Resnick 5 Test Bank. Resnick 6 Solution Manual. Resnick 6 Test Bank.
0コメント